Economic abuse is a component of coercive control.^{1 2 3} It is a behavior that typically occurs over time. Furthermore, it follows a clear pattern of actions.^{4 5} To understand economic abuse, it is necessary to recognize the perpetrator’s underlying goal. They seek to gain power and control over another person. This is accomplished by forcing the recipient of the abuse into a state of dependency and submission.^{6 7} The impact of economic abuse can cause severe, long-lasting health–and financial consequences. These health- and financial problems affect those who experience it and their children.^{8 9 10 11}

What is Economic Abuse?

Economic abuse is an instrument of coercive control. It occurs when one person takes authority over the financial affairs of another through intimidation or force.^{12 13} It is an extension of family- and intimate partner violence that is expressed in the financial dimension of these relationships.^{14 15 16} It is distinct from healthy financial behavior because, like all forms of coercive control, its aim is to frighten, subjugate, and ultimately, harm the recipient of the abuse.^{17 18} Economic abuse is an “invisible” and “unseen” aspect of coercive control.^{19 20}

The perpetrator’s goal is to limit the victim-survivor’s access to financial resources.²¹ Their actions are designed to destroy the agency of the targeted person over time as they are kept economically unstable and dependent on the perpetrator.^{22 23}

What is Coercive Control?

To understand economic abuse, we first need to know what coercive control is–because it’s the context in which economic abuse and all domestic violence occurs.^{24 25} Coercive control is a set of actions one person does to subjugate another (see Figure 1).^{26 27}

“Coercive control is “a strategic course of oppressive conduct typically characterized by frequent, but low-level physical abuse and sexual coercion in combination with tactics to intimidate, degrade, isolate, and control victims.”

Evan Stark, PhD, 2013:18

The controlling person is usually a current or former intimate partner.^{28 29} But sometimes, family members also act this way.³⁰

I created the Coercive Trauma Recovery Method™ from seven years of direct professional work with survivors of coercive control and narcissistic abuse. The method is built on the recognition that coercive trauma is a specific category of injury — distinct in its neurological signature, its dismantling of identity, and what genuine recovery from it requires — and that survivors need a framework designed for that specific injury, not a generic approach adapted from it. I also offer expert coaching on how to prove coercive control in court. Book a free 15 minute consultation to learn more.

Expert Trauma Recovery Coaching

Wherever you are on your healing journey, Manya Wakefield is here to help you find purpose in your pain and embark on the next chapter of your life on your terms.

Book a FREE 15-minute call

Signs of Coercive Control

Below are some of the most common acts that make up the pattern of coercive control:^{31 32 33}

Action	Description
Control of Daily Life	Dictates where the person can go, see, wear, and eat.
Put-Downs	Repeated degrading and humiliating the person. Telling the them they are useless or worthless. Calling them degrading names. Criticizing their appearance, intelligence, ability, etc.
Gaslighting 34	Deliberately distorting the person’s reality.
Isolation	Cutting the person off from their support system.
Intimidation and Threats	Threatening to hurt or kill the person, their child, family members, friends, or pets; threatening to take away their child; threatening to reveal private information, i.e. intimate photos or revelations about the person’s sexuality.
Monitoring Time	Overseeing where the person is, where they are going, and what they are doing at all times
Monitoring Communication	Using spyware to track the person’s digital communication.
Obstruction of Employment	Stopping the person from obtaining employment, going to work, and earning their own money. Undermining the person’s education.
Economic Abuse	Controlling of the person’s financial affairs, making sure they have little access to money so that the person becomes dependent on them.
Character Assassination	The abuser rallies and mobilizes their enablers to collectively target and isolate the person. They fabricate deceptive narratives casting themselves in a favorable light while vilifying the victim. Their intention is to undermine the person’s credibility, making sure that any attempts to seek help or support will be dismissed or rejected.
Depravation of Basic Needs	Restricting the person’s access to healthcare and food.
Assault	Physically abusing the person, non-fatal strangulation, acid attacks, immolation. The abuser may harm the person’s children, family members or pets.
Criminal Damage	Damaging or destroying the person’s personal property.
Rape	Sexually assaulting the person and/or raping them.
Stalking	Unwanted attention, contact, harassment, or any other course of conduct that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear for their safety or the safety of someone they know, or to experience substantial emotional distress.
Exploiting Systems, Institutions, and Services	to manipulate, threaten, discredit or harm the victim/survivor. These include the criminal justice system, regulations around immigration, family courts, civil courts, schools, banking systems, health/mental health services, social services, religious institutions, housing services, charities, and NGOs.
Femicide35	The ultimate expression of control. demonstrate willingness to kill the victim/survivor in future; and threatening to burn down the family home.

Why Is Coercive Control So Hard To Spot?

Coercive control is not a single incident. It is a pattern — and patterns, by their nature, can be difficult to see from the inside. One of the most consistent observations made about coercive and controlling behaviour is that it is insidious: it does not begin with cruelty. It begins with what appears to be love.³⁶

In the early stages of an entrapment-based relationship, controlling behaviours are typically disguised as expressions of care, attentiveness, and concern. A partner who monitors your whereabouts frames it as worry. A partner who manages your finances presents it as organisation. A partner who isolates you from friends and family describes it as a desire for closeness. Each individual act, viewed in isolation, can seem reasonable–even romantic. It is only over time, as the behaviors compound and the boundaries of autonomy quietly contract, that the full architecture of control becomes visible. By then, many survivors find themselves already deeply entangled.

The nature of these relationships has been compared to that of a fly caught in a spider’s web– invisible until it is too late, and designed not for a single moment of capture, but for a slow, methodical process of ensnaring, immobilizing, and consuming. The web itself is the point. Its invisibility is not incidental–it is the mechanism

Coercive Control is a Gendered Crime

Understanding coercive control requires an honest engagement with its gendered dimensions.^{37 38 39} The vast majority of perpetrators are men, and the vast majority of victims are women. This is not coincidental. Existing socioeconomic inequalities–including the gender pay gap, the financial penalties associated with caregiving, cultural norms around male authority in the home, and women’s relative economic dependence — create conditions in which coercive control can more easily take root and be more difficult to escape.⁴⁰  Economic abuse, as one expression of coercive control, reflects and reinforces these structural inequalities: it targets the financial independence that might otherwise provide a route out.

This is not to suggest that all men engage in controlling behaviour, nor that men cannot be victims — they can, and they are. But clarity on the gendered pattern is important, both for accurate identification and for effective policy responses.⁴¹ When we speak of coercive control, we are describing a phenomenon that is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, something done by men to women, within a broader social context that has historically made such control possible and, too often, invisible.⁴²

Community awareness still has significant ground to cover. While physical violence is widely understood to be wrong, many people continue to struggle with the idea that violence can be non-physical.⁴³ A representative from a men’s anti-violence organisation observed that while most men firmly believe that hitting a woman is unacceptable, expanding the definition of violence to include psychological, emotional, and financial control can be genuinely challenging for people to accept and internalise. This gap in understanding is not simply a matter of education — it reflects deeply embedded cultural assumptions about what relationships look like, what men are entitled to, and what constitutes harm.

Expert Trauma Recovery Coaching

Wherever you are on your healing journey, Manya Wakefield is here to help you find purpose in your pain and embark on the next chapter of your life on your terms.

Book a FREE 15-minute call

A Public Health Crisis

Coercive control is not only a personal tragedy–it is a public health problem of significant scale.^{44 45} It is the most common context in which women are abused, and it is also the most dangerous. The link between coercive control and femicide — the killing of women by intimate partners — is well established and deeply alarming. Coercive control is not a precursor to danger. In many cases, it is the danger itself, escalating along a continuum that, at its most extreme, ends in a woman’s death.⁴⁶

The subtlety and variability of coercive control — which can involve any combination of physical, psychological, financial, sexual, and social abuse — means that people experiencing it often do not recognise what is happening to them.⁴⁷ The absence of a single dramatic incident can make it difficult to locate the moment the relationship became abusive, because there may be no such moment. The abuse is the accumulation.^{48 49}

Coercive Control is a Crime

Increasingly, legal systems around the world are recognising coercive control not merely as harmful behaviour but as a criminal offence. The Istanbul Convention–adopted by the European Union and addressing violence against women–defines psychological violence in Article 33 as the intentional conduct of seriously impairing a person’s psychological integrity through coercion or threats.⁵⁰ This definition is significant because it frames psychological harm as something that can be deliberately inflicted and legally prosecuted, independent of any physical act.

“The intentional conduct of seriously impairing a person’s psychological integrity through coercion or threats.” ⁵¹

The Istanbul Convention

The United Kingdom criminalised coercive control in 2015, a landmark moment in the legal recognition of non-physical abuse. In the United States, Hawaii became the first state to follow suit in 2020. Legislation continues to evolve across multiple jurisdictions as understanding of coercive control deepens and advocacy for survivors grows stronger.

For a comprehensive overview of how coercive control is defined and prosecuted across different countries, visit the The Global Coercive Control Legislation Index.⁵²

The Subtle Architecture of Economic Abuse

Economic abuse rarely announces itself. It doesn’t arrive with the unmistakable violence of a raised fist or a slammed door. Instead, it is constructed quietly. It occurs through small decisions, seemingly reasonable expectations, and the gradual erosion of a person’s financial autonomy. This subtlety is not incidental. It is, in many cases, its most deliberate feature.

A Spectrum, Not a Binary

Financial relationships exist along a continuum, ranging from the healthy and equal to the controlling and deeply damaging. Between these poles lie grey areas that complicate both recognition and intervention. Two people may share finances unequally–one partner managing accounts while the other earns the income, for example–and do so with full mutual agreement.⁵³ The question of whether such an arrangement constitutes abuse cannot be answered by looking at the structure alone. It must be answered by asking: who benefits, and does one person’s financial life diminish so that another’s can be maintained?

This ambiguity is precisely what perpetrators exploit. By keeping their behavior within the realm of the plausible–the defensible, the deniable–they can sustain control while allowing doubt to do the work of concealment.

The Intentionality of Financial Abuse

What distinguishes economic abuse from mere financial incompatibility or imbalance is the presence of intent: the deliberate shaping of another person’s material circumstances to limit their freedom and deepen their dependence. This intent can be woven into the fabric of ordinary life in ways that are remarkably varied.

A perpetrator may interfere with a victim’s employment, education, or business–sabotaging the very sources through which financial independence could be built. They may claim, spend, or control a partner’s income, assets, or savings, leaving them with no resources of their own. They may dictate what can be accessed and when, reducing an adult to the position of a dependent child seeking permission to spend. On the surface, this can masquerade as organization, as thrift, or even as care.⁵⁴

The abuse can run in the opposite direction too. Victims may be coerced into excessive spending–on gifts, holidays, or experiences–generating a performance of generosity that simultaneously drains their own finances and creates a sense of indebtedness. A partner who refuses to contribute fairly to household bills or child maintenance achieves a similar result through withholding rather than demanding. In both cases, the outcome is the same: the victim is made financially precarious.

Expert Trauma Recovery Coaching

Wherever you are on your healing journey, Manya Wakefield is here to help you find purpose in your pain and embark on the next chapter of your life on your terms.

Book a FREE 15-minute call

Debt as a Weapon

Among the most calculated expressions of economic abuse is the deliberate creation of debt. When a perpetrator takes out credit, makes purchases, or signs agreements in a victim-survivor’s name–or coerces them into doing so–they do not merely take money. They attach liability. The debt remains long after the relationship ends, scarring a person’s credit score and constraining their ability to rent a home, access services, or begin again.

Similarly, false or unreasonable claims that a victim-survivor owes money or assets serve both a material and a psychological function. They manufacture obligation where none legitimately exists, and they sustain contact and conflict even after separation.

How Economic Abuse Impacts Women in the Job Market

Despite being one of the most consequential dimensions of intimate partner violence, economic abuse remains consistently overlooked in healthcare settings. This is a significant gap, because the material consequences of abuse do not exist separately from a person’s physical and mental health–they are inseparable from it. Women who have experienced abuse are more likely to face unemployment, to have moved between multiple jobs, and to report poorer health outcomes overall. Their personal incomes tend to be lower, and they are significantly more likely to depend on public assistance. ⁵⁵

What this picture reveals is not simply financial hardship, but a process of suppression: domestic violence appears to steadily erode a woman’s socioeconomic and occupational standing over time, limiting not just what she earns but what she is able to become. Crucially, this depression of status and potential can occur even when a woman remains employed–meaning that employment alone is not a reliable indicator of economic wellbeing or freedom from abuse.

For healthcare practitioners, this demands a broader lens. Asking whether a patient is in work is not enough. The question must extend to whether she has any real control over her financial life–and whether the erosion of that control is being recognized, named, and addressed as the form of harm it truly is.⁵⁶

Coercive Control Expressed as Economic Abuse

In many relationships defined by entrapment and control, perpetrators systematically structure finances to serve their own protection while exposing their victim-survivor to maximum risk. Assets, savings, and property are placed in the perpetrator’s name–secured and shielded–while debt, loans, and financial liability are assigned to the victim.

This arrangement is rarely accidental. It ensures that when a relationship ends, one person walks away with resources intact while the other inherits financial damage that can take years to undo. Beyond this structural manipulation, perpetrators may also demand access to a victim’s bank account details, monitor transactions, or deliberately withhold information about shared finances–keeping their partner in a state of enforced ignorance about their own economic circumstances. The result is a carefully engineered imbalance: the perpetrator holds knowledge, assets, and security, while the victim-survivor is left exposed, uninformed, and dependent.

Coercive and Controlling Economic Abuse in Action

Perpetrators of economic abuse in intimate partnerships may exhibit one or several of the following behaviors:

Action	Expressions
Obstructing Employment 57 58	• Stopping the person from getting or keeping a job • Interfering with the person’s work attendance, performance, or reputation • Verbal or physical abuse that causes the person to miss work • Not giving the person important documents they need • Not providing transportation the person needs • Making the person financially reliant on the abuser
Control of Household Finances and Resources 59	• Preventing access to the person’s own money, family funds, or bank accounts • Exploiting the person for domestic and other labor • Making the person financially dependent and unable to cover costs for basic needs • Keeping financial information and decisions hidden from the person • Limiting contribution to shared household expenses • Forcing the person to ask or beg for money • Stealing from the person • Making the person worry about having enough food
Denying or Depleting Personal Wealth 60	• Controlling the person’s salary, savings, debt, credit, or employment through actions or threats • Draining the person’s personal finances • Using shared money for gambling • Destroying the person’s belongings
Exploiting Credit and Debt 61	• Making the person responsible for debt • Building up debt that affects the person’s credit score • Putting utilities or loans only in the person’s name • Forcing the person to take on debt to survive • Causing the person to go bankrupt because of someone else’s debts
Restricting Involvement in Social and Economic Activities 62	• Interfering with the person’s education or job • Preventing the person from working or pursuing education • Blocking access to transportation or communication tools
Surveillance and Control of Financial Activities 63	• Monitoring and controlling the person’s finances remotely • Maintaining financial control after the relationship has ended (post-separation abuse)
Withholding Financial Support 64	• Avoiding responsibility for personal spending • Declining to work or apply for benefits • Not paying bills • Not helping with the expenses of raising children
Creating Financial Burdens 65	• Ruining the person’s belongings
Coercing Their Partner into Sex Work 66 67 68	• Sexually exploiting women for money

Examples of Economic Abuse

Economic abuse is often subtle and difficult to spot, particularly when controlling financial behavior has been normalized over time, or is framed by a partner as practicality, care, or tradition. The following real-world examples illustrate the forms it commonly takes–from the overtly intimidating to the quietly systemic. Here are some examples of coercive and controlling economic abuse in action:

• “They opened a credit card in my name without telling me.” One of the most calculated forms of economic abuse involves a perpetrator using a partner’s identity to access credit–without their knowledge or meaningful consent. The victim-survivor is left legally liable for debt they did not choose to incur, often discovering it only when their credit score deteriorates or a creditor makes contact.
• “They insisted I hand over my entire salary every month and gave me an allowance.” When a perpetrator takes complete control of a partner’s income–regardless of who earned it–they reduce an adult to a position of financial dependency. Having to ask permission to spend one’s own money is not an act of organisation. It is a mechanism of control.
• “They sabotaged every job I tried to get.” Employment obstruction is a cornerstone of economic abuse. This may involve hiding car keys, creating arguments before important interviews, turning up at a partner’s workplace to cause a scene, undermining their professional reputation, or simply refusing to provide childcare. The result is a partner who cannot build or sustain financial independence.
• “They ran up thousands in debt on joint accounts, then left–and I was responsible for all of it.” Joint financial liability is routinely exploited in abusive relationships. Perpetrators may spend or borrow freely through shared accounts, then–upon separation–ensure that the debt remains with the victim while assets are transferred into their own name.
• “They refused to contribute to rent or bills but controlled how I spent my money.” Economic abuse does not require that a perpetrator spend a victim’s money. Withholding financial contribution while restricting a partner’s spending achieves the same result: the victim bears the material burden of the household while the perpetrator maintains economic advantage.
• “I wasn’t allowed to study or go back to work after we had children.” Deliberately limiting a partner’s access to education or employment is a long-term investment in their dependency. A person who cannot qualify, upskill, or re-enter the workforce is a person with fewer options–and, therefore, fewer routes out.
• “They gambled away our savings. I didn’t even know we had a joint account until it was empty.” Concealing financial information is a form of economic abuse in itself. When a perpetrator makes decisions about shared assets–including reckless or destructive ones–without a partner’s knowledge, they remove that person’s ability to protect themselves.
• “They threatened to report me to immigration if I tried to take control of my own finances.” Economic abuse frequently intersects with other instruments of coercive control. For people with insecure immigration status, threats of deportation can be used to prevent any attempt to establish financial independence–creating a form of entrapment that operates across multiple systems simultaneously.
• “My name was on every utility contract, but I wasn’t allowed to touch the accounts.” Placing liability in a victim’s name while denying them access or information is a structural form of abuse. It exposes the victim to risk–missed payments, damaged credit, legal consequences–while insulating the perpetrator from accountability.
• “After we separated, they still found ways to financially drain me–through the family courts.” Economic abuse does not end when a relationship does. Vexatious litigation, the deliberate non-payment of child support, and drawn-out legal proceedings are among the most common tools perpetrators use to sustain financial control–and contact–after separation.

How to Safety Plan for Economic Abuse

Leaving an economically abusive relationship is rarely straightforward–and the financial dimension of that complexity is by design. Perpetrators of economic abuse deliberately limit a partner’s resources precisely to make leaving feel impossible. Safety planning cannot undo that harm instantly, but it can create the conditions in which leaving becomes viable.

The following steps are not a prescription. They are a framework–one that should be adapted carefully to your specific circumstances. If you are concerned that your partner monitors your phone, browser history, or financial accounts, please access this information from a safe device and clear your history afterwards. If you are in immediate danger, contact emergency services.

1. Open a separate, secret bank account. If you do not already have a bank account in your name alone, open one–at a different bank to any account you share with your partner. Have statements sent to a trusted address, or opt for paperless statements accessible only via a private email account your partner does not know about. Begin directing any income, benefits, or cash you can into this account.
2. Build an emergency fund gradually. Even small, irregular amounts set aside over time can create critical breathing room. Where possible, withdraw modest amounts of cash–rather than making traceable transfers–to build a fund your partner cannot monitor or access. Store it securely outside the home, with a trusted person, or in a safety deposit box.
3. Gather and copy essential documents. Make copies of every important document you can access safely: your passport, birth certificate, National Insurance or Social Security number, driving licence, marriage certificate, any shared financial statements, property documents, and your children’s documentation. Store copies digitally in a private, password-protected cloud account–or with a trusted person outside the home. Access to these documents is essential for opening bank accounts, applying for benefits, and navigating legal proceedings.
4. Know your credit situation. Request a copy of your credit report from one of the main credit reference agencies (Experian, Equifax, or TransUnion in the UK; Equifax, Experian, or TransUnion in the US). Look for accounts or loans you were not aware of. If debt has been taken out in your name without your knowledge or consent, document it–this information will be important when speaking with a financial advisor or legal representative.
5. Contact a specialist domestic abuse organization. Organizations such as Surviving Economic Abuse (UK), the National Domestic Violence Hotline (US), and NNEDV have advisors with specific expertise in financial abuse. They can help you understand your rights, navigate the benefits system, identify emergency funding, and connect you with legal and housing support. You do not need to have left the relationship to reach out.
6. Consult a legal professional about your financial rights. If you are married or in a civil partnership, you may have legal rights to shared assets, pension entitlements, and child support. A family law solicitor or attorney–particularly one with experience in domestic abuse–can advise you on what you are entitled to and how to protect it. Many offer free initial consultations, and some specialist services provide legal support at no cost to survivors.
7. Speak to your employer or HR department confidentially. If your employment has been obstructed by your partner or a family member, or if you are worried about your financial stability following separation, your employer may be able to offer flexible working arrangements, emergency loans, or access to an Employee Assistance Programme. Many organisations now have domestic abuse workplace policies. You are not obliged to disclose more than you are comfortable sharing.
8. Plan for housing. Housing insecurity is one of the primary barriers to leaving an abusive relationship. Research what options are available to you before you need them: local authority housing, specialist refuge accommodation, and emergency housing grants. In the UK, domestic abuse survivors have legal rights to priority rehousing–a solicitor or domestic abuse advocate can help you access this.

Safety planning is not a single moment. It is a process–and it is one you do not have to undertake alone. Expert coaching is available.

How to Help Someone Experiencing Economic Abuse

If you suspect that someone you know is experiencing economic abuse, your instinct to help matters — and how you act on it matters too. Economic abuse can be deeply hidden, even from those closest to the person experiencing it. Approaching the conversation thoughtfully can make the difference between a survivor feeling supported and feeling judged, or between opening a door and inadvertently closing it.

• Recognise the signs Economic abuse does not always look the way we might expect. Look for patterns rather than individual incidents: a friend who is never able to pay for things independently; a family member whose partner controls every financial decision; someone who expresses fear about discussing money at home; a person who seems to have had their career repeatedly disrupted. These patterns, over time, may indicate something more deliberate than circumstance.
• Create a private, non-pressured space If you are concerned, find a moment to speak with the person alone — away from their partner and in a setting where they feel safe. Do not raise your concerns in front of other people, and do not time your conversation in a way that creates urgency or panic. The goal is to open a conversation, not to force a decision.
• Lead with care, not conclusions Rather than telling someone what you think is happening to them, share what you have noticed and express concern. Saying “I’ve noticed you seem worried about money lately, and I wanted to check in — are you okay?” is very different from “I think your partner is financially abusing you.” The first invites. The second can cause a person to feel defensive, embarrassed, or frightened — and may make them withdraw.
• Believe them If the person does open up, believe what they tell you. Do not minimise, question, or suggest alternative explanations for their partner’s behaviour. Economic abuse is frequently accompanied by gaslighting — a deliberate attempt to make the victim question their own perception. Your unequivocal belief can be profoundly stabilising.
• Do not pressure them to leave immediately Leaving an economically abusive relationship is complex, dangerous, and often financially impossible without preparation and support. Pressuring someone to leave before they are ready — or before they have the means to do so safely — can increase their risk and may cause them to distance themselves from you. Instead, ask how you can help, and let them lead.
• Offer practical, specific support Vague offers of help are difficult to take up. Be specific: “I can hold some documents for you safely,” “You can use my address for post if you need to,” “I can come with you to an appointment,” or “I can help you research your options.” Practical support that respects the person’s autonomy and does not put them at risk is among the most meaningful help you can offer.
• Do not contact or confront the perpetrator Regardless of how you feel about the situation, confronting a partner you believe to be abusive can escalate danger for the person you are trying to protect. It can also alert the perpetrator that their victim has sought external support — which may result in increased surveillance, isolation, or abuse.
• Know where to direct them Familiarise yourself with specialist resources in your area. In the UK, Surviving Economic Abuse (survivingeconomicabuse.org) offers dedicated support. The National Domestic Violence Hotline (thehotline.org) and NNEDV (nnedv.org) are key resources in the US. The presence of economic abuse does not mean physical danger is absent — if you are concerned someone is at immediate risk, contact emergency services.
• Take care of yourself too Supporting someone through abuse is emotionally demanding. You do not need to have all the answers. Being a consistent, non-judgmental presence — someone who checks in, remembers, and does not give up — is itself a profound form of support.

How to Protect Yourself from Economic Abuse

Am I Experiencing Economic Abuse Quiz?

Economic abuse means that someone is exerting control over your ability to earn and disburse your money and financial resources. It is a common feature of coercive control campaigns in family- and intimate partner violence.

The Health Impact of Economic Abuse

Economic abuse does not confine its damage to bank accounts and credit scores. Its reach extends into the body, the mind, and the long-term wellbeing of those who experience it — and of the children who grow up in its shadow. The health consequences of economic abuse are neither incidental nor secondary. They are among its most devastating and enduring effects.^{69 70}

Distinct and Measurable Harm

Research is increasingly clear that economic abuse carries its own category of harm — one that is comparable to, and in some cases exceeds, the health impact of other recognised forms of abuse. Chronic anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder are among the mental health consequences most consistently associated with economic abuse, and the relationship runs in a troubling direction: as economic abuse increases, psychological distress deepens. The financial dimension of control, far from being a lesser form of abuse, is directly implicated in some of the most serious mental health outcomes reported by survivors.

Most starkly, research has identified psychological and economic abuse as the strongest predictors of suicide attempts and psychological distress respectively. This finding demands attention. It means that a woman who cannot access her own money, who is kept in a state of enforced financial dependence, or who watches debt accumulate in her name is not only suffering materially–she is at elevated risk of reaching a point of complete psychological crisis. The removal of financial agency is not a peripheral concern. It can be a matter of life and death.⁷¹

When Conditions Compound

The picture is further complicated by the relationship between co-occurring mental health conditions. When a survivor is living with one mental health disorder — depression, for instance — the likelihood of also experiencing another disorder, such as PTSD or anxiety, increases significantly. These conditions do not simply exist side by side; they amplify one another. For women trapped in economically abusive relationships, this compounding effect creates a mental health burden that is often invisible to the outside world, particularly when financial control prevents them from accessing professional support, affording medication, or attending appointments independently.⁷²

Children in the Shadow of Economic Abuse

The harm does not stop with the adult survivor. Children who are raised in households where economic abuse is present are exposed to an environment of chronic instability, fear, and scarcity–often without the cognitive or emotional framework to understand what is happening around them. The effects of this exposure are both immediate and long-reaching, shaping children’s sense of safety, their relationship with money, and their understanding of what intimate relationships look like.

Recognizing the Full Scope of Harm

Taken together, these findings make a compelling case for treating economic abuse as a serious public health concern–not merely a financial or legal one. The mental and physical health of women and children cannot be fully protected if the economic dimensions of abuse remain unaddressed. Screening, intervention, and recovery support must extend beyond the visible and the immediate. They must reckon with the quiet, grinding damage that economic control inflicts–and with the full human cost it exacts from those who survive it.

Expert Trauma Recovery Coaching

Wherever you are on your healing journey, Manya Wakefield is here to help you find purpose in your pain and embark on the next chapter of your life on your terms.

Book a FREE 15-minute call

The Financial Impact of Economic Abuse

Cross-sectoral consultations have made clear that the impacts of economic abuse on women and children are neither short-lived nor easily undone. Unlike some forms of harm that may diminish once a survivor reaches safety, economic abuse tends to embed itself into a person’s life in ways that persist long after the relationship has ended.⁷³ Those consulted identified three interconnected dimensions of this harm that deserve particular attention:

• It’s a protracted issue: Economic abuse frequently results in damaged credit records that take years to repair, and it does not necessarily end when a relationship does. Perpetrators commonly continue their financial control post-separation– most notably through the deliberate non-payment of child support–ensuring that their influence over a survivor’s material circumstances endures. Over time, this sustained deprivation erodes not only a woman’s financial stability but her confidence in her own ability to manage money. Despite this, current violence support programmes largely fail to reflect the chronic, long-term nature of economic abuse, leaving survivors without the sustained assistance they need to fully recover.⁷⁴
• It compromises youth welfare: When a mother is experiencing economic abuse, the consequences ripple outward to her children. At the most immediate level, children may be deprived of their basic material needs–adequate food, stable shelter, and clothing. Beyond survival, economic abuse can also strip children of ordinary social participation: the inability to pay for school excursions, extracurricular activities, or peer gatherings can isolate children from their communities and deepen the shame and exclusion that already characterises life in an abusive household.⁷⁵
• It perpetuates gendered poverty. Economic abuse forces many women into an impossible position, confronting them with what amounts to a choice between poverty and violence. With limited financial resources and, in many contexts, insufficient social security support to bridge the gap, leaving an abusive relationship can feel financially catastrophic. This is not a failure of will or judgment on the part of survivors. It is a structural trap — and one that economic abuse is specifically designed to create and maintain. The inadequacy of social security provisions compounds this entrapment, leaving women without a viable material alternative to remaining in relationships that are causing them harm.⁷⁶

The long-term financial consequences of economic abuse have begun to attract research attention. A study conducted in the United Kingdom tracked the financial wellbeing of women who had experienced economic abuse over an extended period of time, and its findings were striking. The data revealed significant and shifting patterns in financial outcomes across time–patterns that speak not only to the depth of the harm caused, but to the length of the recovery journey that survivors must navigate, often with very little systemic support.⁷⁷ These findings raise important questions about what meaningful, long-term intervention and recovery actually require–and challenge practitioners, policymakers, and support services to respond with the same persistence that economic abuse itself demonstrates.

Many victim-survivors carry the wounds of economic abuse in the form of ruined credit scores. These damaged records act as a barrier, locking them out of fair and safe financial support and funneling them toward predatory lenders. This doesn’t just increase their debt; it intensifies their daily financial struggle and leaves them dangerously exposed. When safe housing and basic necessities become unreachable, the walls close in–often leaving victims with the belief that they have no other choice but to return to the very abuse perpetrators they sought to escape.⁷⁸

Challenges to Recovery

Poor credit records make it difficult for victims to rebuild their lives

Leaving an economically abusive relationship is not the end of the journey. For many survivors, it is the beginning of a new and equally daunting struggle–one that unfolds not in the home, but in the financial system, the housing market, and the institutions that were never designed with them in mind.

The Credit Record As A Lasting Wound

One of the most concrete and enduring consequences of economic abuse is the damage it leaves on a survivor’s credit record. Debt accumulated in their name, missed payments they had no power to prevent, and financial agreements they were coerced into signing can follow a person for years after they have reached safety. A damaged credit record is not merely an inconvenience. It closes doors. It limits access to safe and affordable credit, pushing survivors toward the fringe lending market where interest rates are high, terms are exploitative, and financial vulnerability deepens rather than resolves. It creates barriers to housing at precisely the moment when stable housing is most needed. In this way, the perpetrator’s control extends forward in time, shaping a survivor’s options long after direct contact has ended.

Untangling the debt left behind by an abusive relationship is a complex and often distressing process. What is needed–and what is too rarely available–are mechanisms that allow credit providers to respond with genuine flexibility: fair and realistic repayment plans, the ability to split or apportion debt that was accumulated jointly, and provisions to waive debt that was entered into under coercion. Where a person has been forced into a credit contract without genuine consent or mutual benefit, the principle of responsible lending must be willing to follow that logic to its conclusion. Debt created through force is not debt in any morally meaningful sense, and the financial system must develop the tools to recognise and respond to that reality.

Poverty as a Trap, Not a Consequence

Recovery is also complicated by the fact that economic abuse does not simply leave survivors poor–it leaves them poor at the very moment they face their greatest financial demands. Finding new housing, meeting legal costs, rebuilding a household, and supporting children without a second income are all expenses that arrive simultaneously. For women without savings–savings that were often deliberately prevented–and with credit histories that have been deliberately damaged, the resources to meet these demands are simply not there.

This is the mechanism by which economic abuse keeps women tethered to violent relationships long after they have recognised the harm. The choice between poverty and violence is not a free choice. It is a structural trap, and one that cannot be dismantled by individual resilience alone. Adequate social security support, accessible legal aid, and financial recovery programmes designed specifically for survivors of economic abuse are not optional extras. They are preconditions for genuine freedom.

The Silence That Surrounds Economic Abuse

Recovery is further impeded by a broader cultural silence around economic abuse. Money, in many communities and cultures, is understood as a private matter–and this privacy becomes a shield behind which abuse can operate unseen. When financial control is woven into long-standing cultural norms about who manages the household money, who makes financial decisions, and what constitutes a husband or father’s role, it becomes extraordinarily difficult for survivors–and those around them–to name what has happened to them. The secrecy that attends violence is compounded by the privacy that attends money, and the result is a form of harm that many people cannot find the language to describe, let alone the courage to report.

Expert Trauma Recovery Coaching

Wherever you are on your healing journey, Manya Wakefield is here to help you find purpose in your pain and embark on the next chapter of your life on your terms.

Book a FREE 15-minute call

Rebuilding After Economic Abuse

Recovery from economic abuse does not begin and end with leaving. In many ways, the financial dimensions of recovery are where the hardest and most invisible work takes place–the untangling of debt, the rebuilding of credit, the relearning of financial agency that was systematically stripped away. This process takes time, and it is rarely linear. But it is possible, and understanding what the journey involves is itself a form of preparation.

• Acknowledge the financial harm as real. The first step in rebuilding is naming what happened–not as financial mismanagement or bad luck, but as abuse. Debt that was accumulated in your name without your consent is not your failure. A credit score damaged by a perpetrator’s actions is not a reflection of your character or capability. Recognizing the source of the harm is essential to addressing it with the seriousness and support it deserves.
• Assess your full financial picture. Before you can begin to rebuild, you need to understand where you stand. Pull your credit report, list all known debts, and take stock of any assets or benefits you are entitled to. This can feel overwhelming–particularly if financial information was deliberately kept from you during the relationship. If possible, do this with the support of a financial advisor, a domestic abuse advocate with financial expertise, or an organization like Surviving Economic Abuse (UK) or NNEDV (US), both of which offer specialist guidance.
• Address debt strategically, starting with coerced debt. Not all debt accumulated during an abusive relationship is yours to carry alone. If you were coerced into taking on debt–through pressure, deception, or force–legal mechanisms may exist to challenge your liability. Contact your creditors to explain your circumstances. Many major banks and lenders now have specialist domestic abuse teams trained to respond with flexibility. Debt charity advisors (such as StepChange in the UK) can also help you navigate repayment options, dispute coerced debt, and avoid predatory lending.
• Rebuild your credit score gradually. A damaged credit record can feel like a permanent door closing. It is not. Credit scores recover–but they require time, consistent positive action, and patience. Practical steps include ensuring you are registered on the electoral roll (UK), paying any current bills on time, keeping credit utilisation low, and potentially using a credit-builder card responsibly over time. Monitor your progress regularly via your credit report.
• Open financial accounts in your name alone. Access to banking is foundational. If your previous accounts were shared, monitored, or controlled, establishing independent accounts–at a bank with a domestic abuse policy if possible–creates the basis for all other financial rebuilding. Some banks offer specific support to survivors, including fee waivers and flexible account options.
• Access the benefits and support you are entitled to. If you have left a relationship and are without income, you may be entitled to housing benefit, universal credit (UK), food assistance, childcare support, or emergency grants. Domestic abuse organisations can provide emergency financial assistance and help you navigate the benefits system. You should not have to navigate this alone, and accessing support is not a sign of weakness–it is a practical use of systems that exist for precisely this purpose.
• Rebuild your relationship with money. Economic abuse does not only damage credit scores and bank balances. It damages a person’s confidence in their own financial judgment. Many survivors find themselves either avoidant of financial decisions–a product of years of being excluded from them–or anxious and hypervigilant in a way that is exhausting and difficult to sustain. Both responses are entirely understandable. Financial therapy, money coaching, or even simply reading introductory personal finance resources can help restore a sense of competence and calm around money over time.
• Understand that emotional recovery and financial recovery are connected The psychological impact of economic abuse–the anxiety, the PTSD, the grief–does not exist in a separate compartment from the financial recovery process. Trauma responses can make financial decision-making feel impossible; financial instability can deepen psychological distress. Addressing both dimensions–ideally with professional support–is not a luxury. It is an integral part of recovery.

Rebuilding after economic abuse is a long road. But it is also one that many survivors have walked–and found, at the end of it, a life that is genuinely their own.

Summary

Economic abuse is a form of violence. It is a facet of coercive control–one that operates through the deliberate manipulation of a person’s financial circumstances to limit their freedom, deepen their dependence, and ensure that leaving feels impossible.

It takes many forms: withholding income, controlling access to money, creating debt, sabotaging employment and education, refusing to pay child support, and using costly legal proceedings as a continued instrument of harassment. It can be overt and aggressive, or quiet and incremental. In either case, its purpose is the same–to maintain power over another person by controlling the material conditions of their life.

Its consequences are serious, wide-ranging, and long-lasting. Survivors face damaged credit records, chronic debt, poverty, housing insecurity, and diminished employment prospects. They experience disproportionate rates of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and psychological distress. Children raised in its shadow face material deprivation and social exclusion. And because economic abuse often intensifies after separation–through non-payment of child support, vexatious legal proceedings, and continued financial sabotage–reaching physical safety is not the same as reaching financial safety.

Despite this, economic abuse remains poorly understood by the public, inadequately addressed by support services, and inconsistently recognized by the financial and legal institutions best positioned to intervene. Cultural norms around money, masculinity, and privacy continue to obscure its presence, making it difficult to name, harder to report, and too easy to overlook.

Addressing economic abuse requires a coordinated response–one that spans healthcare, social services, the financial sector, the legal system, and community education. Survivors need not only safety, but sustained, long-term support that reflects the enduring nature of the harm they have experienced. Above all, they need a system that is willing to call economic abuse what it is: not a private financial matter, but an act of violence–and one that demands an equally serious response.

Related Links

• Financial Abuse: A Hidden Form of Coercive Control
• The Complete Guide to Narcissistic Abuse Recovery
• The Global Coercive Control Legislation Index
• The Global Femicide Legislation Index
• What is Coercive Control? The Definitive Guide

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

How Narcissistic Abuse Rehab Can Help

Liberation from economic abuse was the catalyst for the founding of our organization which operated for the first two years as a non for profit through the generous endowment of our late patron. We specialize in supporting people in the most dire circumstances as they make meaning of difficult experiences and begin again.

If you or a loved one is ready to break free from a toxic relationship and reclaim your life, Narcissistic Abuse Rehab is here to kick start your recovery journey. I developed the Coercive Trauma Recovery Method™ from seven years of direct professional work with survivors of coercive control and narcissistic abuse. The method is built on the recognition that coercive trauma is a specific category of injury — distinct in its neurological signature, its dismantling of identity, and what genuine recovery from it requires — and that survivors need a framework designed for that specific injury, not a generic approach adapted from it. I also offer expert coaching on how to prove coercive control in court. Book a free 15 minute consultation to learn more.

How to Cite This Page

Wakefield, M. (2025). What is Economic Abuse in Coercive Control? Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. Retrieved from https://www.narcissisticabuserehab.com/economic-abuse-in-coercive-control on [Date].

References

Click to view the works cited in this article:

1. Corrie, T., McGuire, M., Deakin, K., Fraser, S., Hucks, K., Jackson, E., & Landvogt, K. (2013). Economic abuse: Searching for solutions. A Spotlight on Economic Abuse Research Report Melbourne: Good Shepherd Youth & Family Service i Kildonan Uniting Care, 9, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2025. ↩︎
2. Stark, E. (2009). Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. Oxford University Press. Pages 242-275. ↩︎
3. Wakefield, M. (2022). What is Coercive Control? Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
4. Stark, E., 2009, Pages 242-276. ↩︎
5. Katz, E. (2022). Coercive Control in Children’s and Mother’s Lives. Oxford University Press. Pages 3-8. ↩︎
6. Stark, E., 2009, page 273. ↩︎
7. Bancroft, L. (2003). Why Does He Do That?: Inside The Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Berkley. ↩︎
8. Wakefield, M. (2020). The Coercive Control of Children with Dr. Evan Stark. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
9. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
10. Cocchiola, C. and Polacko, A. (2024). Framed: Women in the Family Court Underworld. Narc Free Press. ↩︎
11. Wakefield, M. (2023). PTSD And Depression Comorbidity Raise Risk Of Female Mortality. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
12. Corrie et al, 2013. ↩︎
13. Stylianou, A. M. (2018). Economic abuse within intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Violence and victims, 33(1), 3-22. http://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.1.3. Retrieved April 7, 2025. ↩︎
14. Corrie et al, 2013. ↩︎
15. Postmus, J. L., Hoge, G. L., Breckenridge, J., Sharp-Jeffs, N., & Chung, D. (2018). Economic Abuse as an Invisible Form of Domestic Violence: A Multicountry Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018764160 (Original work published 2020). Retrieved April 6, 2025. ↩︎
16. Huang, C. C., Postmus, J. L., Vikse, J. H., & Wang, L. R. (2013). Economic abuse, physical violence, and union formation. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(5), 780-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.020. Retrieved April 7, 2025. ↩︎
17. Corrie et al, 2013. ↩︎
18. Stark, 2009, page 271. ↩︎
19. Postmus, J. L. et al., 2018. ↩︎
20. Antai et al, 2014, pages 808-826. ↩︎
21. Ibid. ↩︎
22. Adams et al., 2008, page 564. ↩︎
23. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
24. Stark, 2009. ↩︎
25. Wakefield, 2022. ↩︎
26. Stark, E., 2009. ↩︎
27. Barlow, C. and Walklate, S. (2022). Coercive Control. Routledge. Page 1. ↩︎
28. Stark, E., 2009. ↩︎
29. Barlow & Walklate, 2022, Page 1. ↩︎
30. Barlow & Walklate, 2022, Page 1. ↩︎
31. Wakefield, 2022. ↩︎
32. Stark, 2009, pages 244-245. ↩︎
33. Katz, 2022, pages 3-8. ↩︎
34. Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence against women, 25(1), 81-104. ↩︎
35. Wakefield, M. (2026). The Urgent Need for Femicide Legislation. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
36. Wakefield, M. (2020). Psycho-Emotional Abuse: The Essential Guide. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
37. Stark, E., 2009. ↩︎
38. Barlow & Walklate, 2022, Page 1. ↩︎
39. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
40. Antai, D., Antai, J., & Anthony, D. S. (2014). The relationship between socio-economic inequalities, intimate partner violence and economic abuse: A national study of women in the Philippines. Global public health, 9(7), 808-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.917195. Retrieved April 6, 2025. ↩︎
41. Weaver, T.L.; Sanders, C.K.; Campbell, C.L. & Schnabel, M. (2009). ‘Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Domestic Violence: Related Financial Issues Scale (DV-FI)’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 569-85. ↩︎
42. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
43. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
44. Antai et al, 2014), pages 808-826. ↩︎
45. Wakefield, M. (2024). The Global Femicide Crisis: A Woman is Killed Every 10 Minutes. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
46. Attorney General’s Department. (2024). Understanding coercive control and economic and financial abuse. Australia Government. Retrieved April 9, 2025. ↩︎
47. Stark, 2009, pages 277-278. ↩︎
48. Stark, 2009, pages 277-278. ↩︎
49. Wakefield, M. (2026). National Femicide Rates in the united States. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
50. The Istanbul Convention. (2011). Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. Council of Europe. Page 17. ↩︎
51. The Istanbul Convention, 2011, page 17. ↩︎
52. Wakefield, M. (2020). Coercive Control Legislation Global Database. Narcissistic Abuse Rehab. ↩︎
53. Corrie et al., 2013. ↩︎
54. Katz, 2022, pages 5-6. ↩︎
55. Antai et al, 2014), pages 808-826. ↩︎
56. Lloyd, S. (1997). The effects of domestic violence on women’s employment. Law & Policy, 19(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00025. Retrieved April 6, 2025. ↩︎
57. Connection for Abused Women and Their Children. (2024). Domestic Violence: A Barrier to Job Opportunities and Stable Employment. CAWC. ↩︎
58. Katz, E. (2022). Coercive Control in Children’s and Mother’s Lives. Oxford University Press. Pages 4-7. ↩︎
59. Ibid. ↩︎
60. Ibid. ↩︎
61. Ibid. ↩︎
62. Ibid. ↩︎
63. Ibid. ↩︎
64. Ibid. ↩︎
65. Ibid. ↩︎
66. Ibid. ↩︎
67. Landvogt, K., & Ramanathan, R. (2011). Long-term security prevents family violence. Parity, 24(8), 16-17. ↩︎
68. Sharp, N. (2008). ‘What’s Yours is Mine’: The Different Forms of Economic Abuse and its Impact on Women and Children Experiencing Domestic Violence. Refuge. ↩︎
69. Barlow & Walklate, 2022, Page 55. ↩︎
70. Stark, E., 2009. ↩︎
71. Antai et al, 2014), pages 808-826. ↩︎
72. Antai et al, 2014), pages 808-826. ↩︎
73. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
74. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
75. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
76. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎
77. Sharp, 2008. ↩︎
78. Corrie, T. et al., 2013. ↩︎

---

Photos by Deposit Photos. All graphics created by Manya Wakefield for Narcissistic Abuse Rehab are copyrighted and protected by the law. Any unauthorized use, copying, reproduction, or distribution of these materials is strictly prohibited. Violators will be subjected to legal action and prosecuted to the full extend of the law.

For licensing inquiries or permissions, please send a request via our contact page.